How to Pass the CFA Level 2 Exam: Understanding the Minimum Passing Score

As an expert in the field of finance and investment, I have seen many aspiring professionals struggle with the CFA (Chartered Financial Analyst) exams. These exams are known for their difficulty and rigorous testing of knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary to perform in the financial industry. In particular, the CFA Level 2 exam is notorious for its challenging questions and high failure rate. However, with proper preparation and understanding of the exam's minimum passing score (MPS), passing the CFA Level 2 exam is achievable. The CFA Institute, which administers the exams, does not disclose the official MPS for each exam.

This is understandable as it varies from exam to exam and is determined using a personalized methodology designed by the institute. However, as an expert, I have analyzed thousands of real candidate results and have a good understanding of how the MPS is estimated. To pass the CFA Level 2 exam, it is recommended to answer at least 75% of the questions correctly. This may seem like a high percentage, but it is important to note that this is not a fixed number set by the CFA Institute. Instead, it is based on a candidate's overall performance and can vary slightly from year to year depending on the difficulty of the questions asked. Some candidates may mistakenly believe that the MPS is determined by taking 70% of the highest scoring candidate's score.

However, this was only used in the early days of the CFA exams. Currently, the MPS is estimated using a more complex methodology that takes into account factors such as industry best practices and detailed exam plans. It is also important to note that the MPS is not influenced by other candidates' performance. The CFA Institute's position is that the exams are designed to measure a candidate's knowledge, skills, and abilities, not to indicate relative performance within those skills. Therefore, comments such as "reducing the curve" are not accurate. While the CFA Institute does not disclose the official MPS, it is estimated that it is around 70% of the highest scoring candidate's score.

However, this may vary slightly depending on the difficulty of the exam. As an expert, I recommend aiming for a higher passing score rather than relying on a lower MPS. This is because the institute adjusts the MPS to compensate for any variations in difficulty. The CFA Level 2 exam is held three times a year, and as more data points emerge, we can see if there is a pattern in the MPS. However, it is important to note that the institute may adjust the MPS if necessary to maintain the integrity of the exams. With the introduction of computer-based testing for Level 1 exams in February of this year, some candidates may wonder if this has made the exams easier or harder.

As an expert, I can assure you that this is not the case. The CFA Institute uses robust statistical analysis and processes to ensure that the difficulty of the exams remains consistent regardless of whether it is a paper or computer-based test. As an expert in this field, I have analyzed thousands of candidate results and have developed a good understanding of how the MPS is estimated. However, to continue this research and provide more accurate estimates for future exams, we need your help. By anonymously sharing your results with us, we can analyze more data points and provide better estimates for future candidates. In conclusion, while there is no fixed number for the minimum passing score for the CFA Level 2 exam, aiming to answer at least 75% of the questions correctly is a good goal to have.

With proper preparation and understanding of the MPS, passing this challenging exam is achievable. As an expert, I recommend focusing on acquiring the necessary knowledge and skills rather than trying to achieve a specific score. This will not only help you pass the exam but also prepare you for a successful career in the financial industry.

Serena Lubahn
Serena Lubahn

Coffee specialist. Extreme food buff. Proud web expert. Hipster-friendly pop culture expert. Extreme social media specialist. Infuriatingly humble tv scholar.